Which case indicates the necessity for an arrest warrant when entering a home?

The correct choice is Payton v. New York because it established critical precedent regarding the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. This landmark case determined that law enforcement officers must obtain an arrest warrant in order to enter a person’s home to make an arrest, unless exigent circumstances exist.

The ruling emphasized that the home is afforded a heightened level of privacy and protection under the law, and entering without a warrant constitutes a violation of an individual's constitutional rights. The Court articulated the importance of obtaining a warrant as a safeguard against arbitrary intrusions by the police, which is a fundamental principle in maintaining the balance between law enforcement needs and individual privacy rights.

The other cases mentioned involve different circumstances or aspects of law enforcement procedures and do not address the warrant requirement for home entries in the same way. For example, Michigan v. Summers deals with the right of police to detain occupants during a search warrant execution, while Maryland v. Wilson involves ordering passengers out of vehicles during lawful traffic stops. State v. Sherman focuses on matters specific to the state laws rather than the broader constitutional issues at play in Payton v. New York. Thus, none of these cases establish the same necessity for an arrest warrant to enter a home as Payton does.