Which case adopted Rawlings vs. Kentucky in Louisiana concerning search incidents to arrest?

The case that adopted Rawlings v. Kentucky concerning search incidents to arrest in Louisiana is indeed State v. Sherman. This is significant because it illustrates how Louisiana courts interpret the application of search incident to arrest principles established in Rawlings v. Kentucky. In Rawlings, the Supreme Court recognized that officers are allowed to perform searches of a person and surrounding area after an arrest, and this principle is foundational to maintaining public safety and the integrity of evidence.

State v. Sherman further solidifies the understanding of how these principles apply specifically within Louisiana, responding to the state's legal precedents and expectations regarding lawful searches. By establishing a clear precedent, State v. Sherman ensures consistent application of the law concerning searches related to arrests, providing law enforcement with the guidance needed in the field.

The other options mentioned do not directly pertain to Louisiana’s adoption of the Rawlings doctrine. Payton v. New York focuses on the necessity of obtaining a warrant before entering a home for an arrest, while Maryland v. Wilson deals with the authority of police to control passengers in a vehicle during a traffic stop. Carroll v. US addresses the automobile exception to the warrant requirement but is not related to the search incident to arrest within the context of Louisiana law.