What must law enforcement officers do during an arrest according to the Miranda decision?

The requirement established by the Miranda decision focuses specifically on the actions law enforcement officers must take when a suspect is in custody and subject to interrogation. This decision mandates that officers inform the suspect of their rights, which include the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. This notification is crucial because it serves to protect the suspect's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, ensuring that any statements made by the suspect during questioning are made voluntarily and with an understanding of the consequences.

By informing the suspect of their rights, officers help ensure that the suspect is fully aware of their legal protections before any interrogation begins. This not only upholds the integrity of the legal process but also reinforces the importance of voluntary consent during questioning. If officers fail to give this warning, any statements obtained during the interrogation may be deemed inadmissible in court.

In contrast, securing the scene of a crime, taking a statement from the victim, and completing an incident report are important aspects of law enforcement procedures but are not directly related to the specific requirements set by the Miranda ruling. These actions pertain to various stages of the investigation rather than the rights of the suspect during custodial interrogation.