What case allowed law enforcement officers to take "unquestioned command" when executing a search warrant?

The case that established the principle of "unquestioned command" for law enforcement officers executing a search warrant is Michigan v. Summers. In this ruling, the Supreme Court recognized that law enforcement officers have the authority to take control of an entire premises when executing a search warrant. This principle acknowledges the need for officers to ensure their safety and the integrity of the search by preventing the possibility of evidence destruction or threats to officers by individuals present at the scene.

In Michigan v. Summers, the Court determined that officers could detain occupants of a dwelling while the search was being executed, which is critical for maintaining order and security. This case particularly highlights the balance between individual rights and the necessity for effective law enforcement procedures during the execution of a search warrant, cementing the ability of officers to assert control over a situation to facilitate their duties effectively.

The other cases mentioned address different aspects of search and seizure law or have varying fact patterns that do not specifically confer the same broad command authority during the execution of a warrant. Understanding the implications of Michigan v. Summers is vital for recognizing the legal framework surrounding law enforcement practices in such scenarios.